<-- Menu >-- Norlite Corporation
628 S. Saratoga Street
Cohoes, NY 12047
Phone (518) 235-0030
Fax (518) 235-0233
E-mail: farchambault@norliteagg.com
Back Menu Next
[Standard Specs] [Introduction] [Physical Properties] [Structural Lt. Wt. Concrete] [Bridge Decking] [Pumping]
[Masonry] [Thermal Insulation] [Sound Absorption] [Fire Resistance] [Lightweight Fill] [Other Uses]

Thermal Insulation

With the many improvements being made in heating and air conditioning equipment for residences, commercial and office buildings, hotels, industrial buildings and the like, it is becoming increasingly important for architects and engineers to have ready access to information on the thermal insulation properties of building materials. Since the mechanical engineer designs the heating and cooling plant on the basis of the total hourly heat transmission through the exterior parts of the building, optimum efficiency in economical structural design requires analysis of relative heat loss through the elements of the structure.

Since thermal insulation varies inversely with unit weight, lightweight concrete has better thermal insulation properties than normal-weight concrete. The thermal conductivity, k, for lightweight concrete is usually between 2.5 and 3.6 Btu per hour per inch thickness per square foot per degree Fahrenheit for oven-dry concretes weighing 80 to 100 Ibs. per cubic foot. The corresponding k value for normalweight concrete is generally between 9.0 and 12.0, depending upon the unit weight of the concrete.

The table below shows R-values for Solid Concrete (Normally Dry)

TABLE 2A. R–values - Solid Concrete (Normally Dry)*

Concrete type Unit weight (lbs. per c.f.) Per inch Thickness of Concrete
2 4 6 8 10 12

Insulating
Lightweight



Structural
Lightweight



Structural
Normal-
Weight
  20
  30**
  40
  50
  60
  70
  80
  90
 100
 110***
 120
 130
 140
 145****
 150
 1.43 
 1.00 
  .83 
  .67 
  .52 
  .45 
  .37 
  .30 
  .24 
  .19 
  .14 
  .11 
  .083
  .075
  .065
 2.86
 2.00
 1.66
 1.34
  .04
  .90
  .74
  .60
  .48
  .38
  .28
  .22
  .16
  .15
  .13
 5.72
 4.00
 3.32
 2.68
 2.08
 1.80
 1.48
 1.20
  .96
  .76
  .57
  .43
  .33
  .30
  .26
 8.58
 6.00
 4.98
 4.02
 3.12
 2.70
 2.22
 1.80
 1.44
 1.13
  .86
  .65
  .50
  .45
  .39
 11.44
  8.00
  6.64
  5.36
  4.16
  3.60
  2.96
  2.40
  1.92
  1.51
  1.14
   .87
   .67
   .60
   .52
 14.30
 10.00
  8.30
  6.70
  5.20
  4.50
  3.70
  3.00
  2.40
  1.89
  1.43
  1.09
   .83
   .75
   .65
 17.16
 12.00
  9.96
  8.04
  6.24
  5.50
  4.44
  3.60
  2.88
  2.27
  1.71
  1.31
  1.00
   .90
   .78

* Values do not include effects of surface resistance
** Roof fill, roof slabs, and wall slabs
*** Average weight for sanded lightweight structural concrete
    Definition - ACI 318-71 limits structural lightweight to 115 pcf
**** Usual weight for normal-weight concrete

Conductivity, (k), Btu in./hr. sq. ft. ·F R(l/k)

NOTE: Typical increases in conductivity and unit weight, from the PCA Development Bulletin D114. General Relation of Heat Flow Factors to the Unit Weight of Concrete.

Back to top

Thermal Insulation of Concrete Masonry

Concrete masonry is energy efficient. A National Bureau of Standards study reveals that masonry out–performs other systems in dynamic heating and cooling conditions more effectively than steel stud. Masonry's mass delivers vital economy by reducing heat loss in cold weather and heat gain in warm weather. Its inherent thermal storage qualities assist in reducing heating and cooling loads, thus providing substantial long-term savings. The ability of concrete masonry backup to conserve energy is further supported by the fact that insulation utilized in conjunction with a masonry system resists moisture more effectively than the fiberglass batt insulation used in a steel stud system.

The tables below show R-values for Hollow Concrete Block Walls

TABLE 1A. Resistance R-values for Hollow Concrete Block Walls*


Block Thickness with and without Core Insulation
Unit weight** 4 in. 6 in. 8 in. 10 in. 12 in.
lb./cf Filled Open Filled Open Filled Open Filled Open Filled Open
 60
 80
100
120
140
 3.36
 2.79
 2.33
 1.92
 1.14
 2.07
 1.68
 1.40
 1.17
 0.77
 5.59 
 4.59
 3.72
 2.95
 1.59
 2.25
 1.83
 1.53
 1.29
 0.86
 7.46
 6.06
 4.85
 3.79
 1.98
 2.30
 2.12
 1.75
 1.46
 0.98
 9.35
 7.46
 5.92
 4.59
 2.35
 3.0
 2.40
 1.97
 1.63
 1.08
10.98
 8.70
 6.80
 5.18
 2.59
 3.29
 2.62
 2.14
 1.81
 1.16

*Values do not include effects of surface resistance **Unit weight of concrete in the block

NOTE: R-values relating to unit weight, thickness, and core treatment are as presented in NCMA-TEK 38, 1972, National Concrete Masonry Association.
Back to top

ESCSI Expanded Shale Clay and Slate Institute

Info. Sheet # 311

Energy Efficient Buildings with Lightweight Concrete Masonry

Engineering guide for using ASHRAE/IES 90.1 ENVelope STandarD (ENVSTD) computer program.

Back to top

Lightweight Concrete Masonry

Expanded shale, clay and slate lightweight concrete masonry is one of the smartest wall systems available, providing structural integrity, beauty and energy efficiency all in one. Lightweight concrete masonry walls offer a unique energy efficient system by combining high R-values, high thermal mass and low thermal bridging. In addition, lightweight blocks provide superior fire resistance, sound absorption ability, and resistance to vermin, rust and rot. Lightweight blocks also increase mason productivity thus making load-bearing lightweight concrete masonry wall systems cost competitive and unsurpassed in quality and value.

Back to top

ASHRAE/IES 90.1-1989

The latest version of ASHRAE's (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers) building energy conservation standard clearly demonstrates that lightweight block walls are indeed energy efficient. This latest version, ASHRAE/IES 90.1-1989, provides state-of-the-art guidance regarding the design of energy efficient buildings. Standard 90.1 looks at the performance of many building characteristics, rather than concentrating on wall R-values as earlier versions did. These building characteristics include the effects of wall thermal mass, thermal bridging and insulation position.

Back to top

Thermal Mass - Heat Capacity

The effects of wall thermal mass are well known. Massive walls, such as concrete masonry, poured concrete or clay brick have the ability (due to their high heat capacity) to delay and reduce the impact of outdoor temperature changes on conditioned indoor environments. This means less heat gain or loss, depending on the season, that must be offset by energy consuming HVAC equipment. ASHRAE 90.1 quantifies thermal mass effects based on a wall's heat capacity. Table 1 lists block heat capacity and Table 2 lists heat capacity for other common building materials. ASHRAE defines heat capacity as wall weight per square foot times specific heat.

Back to top

Thermal Bridging

Thermal bridges in buildings take place anywhere an insulating material is interrupted by a highly conductive material; e.g., steel studs interrupting batt insulation continuity or metal fasteners in heavily insulated exterior walls. Simply put, thermal bridges occur where differences in material thermal conductivities allow for lateral heat flow; e.g., heat flowing along the surface of a wall and then flowing through the wall via a steel stud. ASHRAE 90.1 considers many thermal bridges. Table 3 (Table 8C-2 in ASHRAE 90.1) lists the effects of thermal bridging in metal stud walls. Table 1 lists block R-values calculated according to ASHRAE's series parallel method recommended by National Concrete Masonry Association which accounts for thermal bridging in block. Because of its low thermal bridging lightweight block walls with hollow cores (no insulation) have higher R-values than normal weight block walls with core insert insulation. This is clearly shown in the following table of R-Values (information taken from Table #1).

CMU Size Lightweight
90#/CF
uninsulated
Normal Weight
135#/CF core
insert insulated
8" 2.9 2.7
10" 3.0 2.8
12" 3.1 2.8

Back to top

Walls' Thermal Performance

ASHRAE 90.1 provides two methods for determining how the walls' thermal properties impact on a building envelope energy-efficiency criteria. The first method is prescriptive and provides 38 Alternate Component Package (ACP) Tables. The ACP tables list maximum wall U· values, U·=1/R. The second method is the systems performance method and it employs a computer-based program, ENVelope STandarD (ENVSTD). This approach requires input of many building parameters including wall heat capacity and wall U·. ENVSTD uses these building-wide inputs to determine whether a design meets 90.1's energy efficiency criteria. Because of this building-wide approach, lightweight block wall systems with high heat capacity and moderate R-values are as energy efficient as "highly" insulated steel stud wall systems. For the ease of comparison, four energy compliance examples are included. The ENVSTD computer program was used to verify the excellent energy performance of lightweight concrete masonry walls. Each example uses the appropriate changes in the Wall U· Heat Capacity values and INsulation POSition with all other building parameters unchanged. Examples 1 and 2 compare an apartment building in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Examples 3 and 4 compare an office building in El Paso, Texas.

Back to top

TABLE 1 THERMAL PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS

Concrete Masonry Unit & Insulation Type Lightweight 901 Normal Weight 1351
 Uo*    Rt    HC
  Uo*    Rt    HC
4"  Uninsulated
0.42   2.4   3.8
 0.60   1.7   5.8
6"  Uninsulated
0.39   2.6   4.9
 0.51   2.0   7.5
    Uninsulated
    2" Insert, core (fig A)
    ESCS 2 LWA 50#/CF
8"  2" Insert, continuous (fig B)
    Vermiculite
    Perlite
    UF foam
    4" Insert, continuous (fig B)
0.35   2.9   6.2
0.24   4.2   6.3
0.21   4.8   9.4
0.15   6.7   6.1
0.15   6.6   6.7
0.14   7.0   6.6
0.13   7.5   6.3
0.11   9.2   5.9
 0.47   2.1   9.6
 0.37   2.7   9.6
 0.32   3.1  12.7
 0.25   4.0   9.2
 0.27   3.7  10.0
 0.26   3.8   9.9
 0.25   3.9   9.6
 0.20   5.1   8.9
    Uninsulated
    2" Insert, core (fig A)
    ESCS 2 LWA 50#/CF
10" 2" Insert, continuous (fig B)
    Vermiculite
    Perlite
    UF foam
    4" Insert, continuous (fig B)
0.33   3.0   7.3
0.24   4.2   7.3
0.17   5.9  11.4
0.15   6.9   7.1
0.12   8.1   7.9
0.12   8.5   7.8
0.11   9.1   7.3
0.10   9.7   6.9
 0.44   2.3  11.0
 0.35   2.8  11.0
 0.27   3.7  15.2
 0.24   4.2  10.6
 0.23   4.4  11.6
 0.22   4.5  11.5
 0.22   4.6  11.1
 0.19   5.4  10.3
    Uninsulated
    2" Insert, core (fig A)
    ESCS 2 LWA 50#/CF
12" 2" Insert, continuous (fig B)
    Vermiculite
    Perlite
    UF foam
    4" Insert, continuous (fig B)
0.32   3.1   8.7
0.24   4.1   8.7
0.14   7.0  14.0
0.15   6.9   8.4
0.10   9.7   9.5
0.098 10.2   9.3
0.093 10.8   8.8
0.10   9.7   8.2
 0.43   2.3  13.3
 0.35   2.8  13.4
 9.23   4.3  18.7
 0.23   4.3  12.9
 0.20   5.1  14.2
 0.19   5.2  14.0
 0.19   5.4  13.4
 0.18   5.5  12.6


l Concrete Density (pounds/cubic foot)
2 ESCS = Expanded Shale Clay & Slate Lightweight Aggregate

All Concrete Masonry Units are calculated for ASTM C-90 Hollow Load-Bearing Concrete Masonry Units. Dimensions are from "Calculation of U–Values of Hollow Concrete Masonry by Rudolph C Valore, Jr. in CONCRETE INTERNATIONAL (Feb. 1980) except the continuous inserts. Manufacturers of cut-web masonry systems should be contacted for structural compliance of their product. The ESCS, vermiculite and perlite thermal values are for loose fill poured in the erected block wall. The UF foam wall is foamed in place.

* U· in Btu/(h·ft2··F); R. in (h·ft7··F/Btu); HC in (Btu/ft2··F)

Back to top

TABLE 2 THERMAL PROPERTIES OF VARIOUS BUILDING MATERIALS

THERMAL RESISTANCE (R), AND HEAT CAPACITY (HC)

Building material R-values are from 1989 ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals, Chapter 22. HC-values are calculated from Density and Specific Heat from the same source, except as noted otherwise.


MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Per Thickness Listed
THICKNESS R VALUE HC VALUE WEIGHT
(in.) (h x ft2 x oF/Btu) (Btu/ft2 x oF) (pounds/ft2)
BUILDING BOARD
Gypsum Wallboard 0.5 0.45 0.54 2.1
Plywood (Douglas Fir) 0.5 0.62 0.41 1.4
Fiber board sheathing, regular density 0.5 1.32 0.23 0.8
Hardboard, medium density 0.5 0.69 0.65 2.1
Particleboard, medium density 0.5 0.53 0.65 2.1
INSULATING MATERIALS
Mineral Fiber With Metal Stud Framing1
R-11, 2X4 @16" (R-11 X .50 correction factor) 5.50 0.30 1.7
R-11, 2X4 @ 24" (R-11 X .60 correction factor) 6.60 0.27 1.4
R-19, 2X6 @16" (R-19 X .40 correction factor) 7.60 0.44 2.4
R-19, 2X6 @ 24" (R-19 X .45 correction factor) 8.55 0.39 1.9
Mineral Fiber With Wood Framing2 (with lapped siding, 1/2" sheathing, and 1/2" gypsum board)
R-11, 2X4 @ 16" on center 12.44 2.01 6.1
R-19, 2X6 @ 24" on center 19.11 2.13 6.5
Board, Slabs, and Loose Fill
Cellular glass 1 2.86 0.13 0.7
Expanded polystyrene, extruded 1 5.00 0.08 0.3
Expanded polystyrene, molded beads3 1 4.00 0.03 0.1
Perlite3 1 3.13 0.11 0.4
Polyurethane 1 6.25 0.05 0.5
UF Foam4 1 4.35 0.02 0.1
Vermiculite3 1 2.44 0.13 0.4
Expanded Shale, Clay & Slate LWA5

    30#/CF Dry loose weight

1 1.21 0.53 2.5

    40#/CF Dry loose weight

1 1.02 0.70 3.3

    50#/CF Dry loose weight

1 0.88 0.88 4.2
Mortar3, Plaster & Misc. Masonry
Clay brick masonry 3.63 0.40 8.16 40.8
Stucco and cement plaster, sand aggregate 1 0.20 1.93 9.7
Gypsum plaster, perlite aggregate 1 0.67 1.20 3.8
Mortar 1 0.20 2.00 10.0
CONCRETE3 (cast in place, precast)
60 pcf 1 0.60 1.05 5.0
70 pcf 1 0.49 1.23 5.8
80 pcf 1 0.40 1.40 6.7
90 pcf 1 0.33 1.58 7.5
100 pcf 1 0.27 1.75 8.3
110 pcf 1 0.22 1.93 9.2
120 pcf 1 0.18 2.10 10.0
135 pcf 1 0.13 2.48 11.3
150 pcf 1 0.10 2.75 12.5
WOODS
Southern Pine 1 1.00-0.89 1.16-1.34 3.0-3.4
California Redwood 1 1.35-1.22 0.80-0.91 2.0-2.3
  1. R–Value corrected per ASHRAE/IES 90.1-1989 8C2; HC from vendors' data
  2. Calculated per ASHRAE 1989 FUNDAMENTALS, Chapter 22
  3. NCMA TEK 164 and NCMA *Concrete Masonry R–Value Program"
  4. NBS Tech Note 946
  5. RValues from Thermophysical Properties of Masonry and its Constituents, Part I by Rudolph Valore, Jr.

Back to top

TABLE 3 METAL STUD CORRECTION FACTORS

Wall Section with Metal Studs
Parallel Path Correction Factors
Corrected R-Values for Insulation with Metal Studs
Size of Members Gauge of Stud Spacing of Framing (inches) Cavity Insulation R-Value Correction Factor
2 X 4 18-16 16 o.c. R-11 0.50 R-5.5
2 X 4 18-16 24 o.c. R-11 0.60 R-6.6
2 X 6 18-16 16 o.c. R-19 0.40 R-7.6
2 X 6 18-16 24 o.c. R-19 0.45 R-8.6

Back to top

Reference and Order Information

Two Informative Reference articles are:

1- Standard 90.1's ENVSTD: Using it for compliance. The ENVSTD software program can be used to comply with the building envelope requirements. By: Drury B. Crowley and Jean H. Boulin

ASHRAE Journal May 1990

2 - Standard 90.1's ENVSTD: A tool to evaluate building envelope design. This program can help the designer improve building envelope thermal performance and other characteristics By: Drury B. Crowley, J. Steven Schlepping and Jean J. Boulin

ASHRAE Journal July 1990

Back to top

EXAMPLE 1 - Apartment Milwaukee, WI
12" CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT WALL
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION HC R
90 PCF LW CMU, including film coefficients 9.30 10.20 (table 1) The insulation position is "INTEGRAL" with the wall's thermal mass. Use insulation position #2.
All cells filled with perlite loose fill
U=0.098
ASHRAE/IES STANDARD 90.1-1989
ENERGY EFFICIENT DESIGN OF NEW BUILDINGS EXCEPT LOW-RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
CITY:139 Milwaukee WI
CODE:<B,C,H,>:Both Heated and Cooled
BUILDING:Apartment
DATE:12" CMU 90 PCF Perlite

WALL ORIENTATION

N NE E SE S SW W NW WEIGHTED AVERAGE CRITERIA

WL AREA 17158
59646
20896
58800
0.230 0.300
GL AREA 3410
14130
4720
13800
WWR WWR
SCx 0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.830 0.630
PF 0
0
0
0
0.000 0.0
VLT 0.79
0.79
0.79
0.79
0.790 N/A
Uof 0.520
0.520
0.520
0.520
0.520 0.537
WALL Uo 0.098
0.098
0.098
0.098
0.098 0.077
HC 9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.300 1
INS POS 2
2
2
2
2 N/A
EQUIP .38
.38
.38
.38
0.380 0.380
LIGHTS 0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.670 0.670
DLCF 0
0
0
0
0.000 0.000

LOADS TOTAL
HEATING 3.050
8.202
2.173
8.327
21.752< 24.240
COOLING 1.692
9.313
3.197
9.593
23.795< 24.557
TOTAL 4.742
17.514
5.370
17.920
45.547< 48.797


(Computer screen information ENVSTD Version 2.2) ***** PASSES *****

Back to top

EXAMPLE 2 - Apartment Milwaukee, WI
TYPICAL FACE BRICK STEEL STUD WALL
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION HC R
Face Brick, 4" 8.16 0.40 The insulation position is "INTERIOR" with the wall's thermal mass. Use insulation position #3.
Fiber board sheathing 1/2" reg. density 0.23 1.32
Insulation R-19 metal stud 2X6 @ 16 o.c. 0.44 7.60 (Uncorrected R=19)
Gypsum board, 1/2" 0.54 0.45
Film coefficients, (sum of inside and outside)
0.85

____ ____

9.37 10.62 (Uncorrected R=22)


U=0.094
ASHRAE/IES STANDARD 90.1-1989
ENERGY EFFICIENT DESIGN OF NEW BUILDINGS EXCEPT LOW-RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
CITY:139 Milwaukee WI
CODE:<B,C,H,>:Both Heated and Cooled
BUILDING:Apartment
DATE:Brick R-19 STUD 16" o.c.

WALL ORIENTATION

N NE E SE S SW W NW WEIGHTED AVERAGE CRITERIA

WL AREA 17158
59646
20896
58800
0.230 0.300
GL AREA 3410
14130
4720
13800
WWR WWR
SCx 0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.830 0.630
PF 0
0
0
0
0.000 0.0
VLT 0.79
0.79
0.79
0.79
0.790 N/A
Uof 0.520
0.520
0.520
0.520
0.520 0.537
WALL Uo 0.094
0.094
0.094
0.094
0.094 0.077
HC 9.37
9.37
9.37
9.37
9.370 1
INS POS 3
3
3
3
3 N/A
EQUIP .38
.38
.38
.38
0.380 0.380
LIGHTS 0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.670 0.670
DLCF 0
0
0
0
0.000 0.000

LOADS TOTAL
HEATING 3.069
8.247
2.238
8.389
21.943< 24.240
COOLING 1.756
9.651
3.363
10.012
24.783< 24.557
TOTAL 4.825
17.898
5.601
18.401
46.726< 48.797


(Computer screen information ENVSTD Version 2.2) ***** PASSES *****

Back to top

EXAMPLE 3 - Office Building El Paso, TX
12" MASONRY UNIT WALL
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION HC R
90 PCF LW CMU, including film coefficients 9.30 10.20 (Table 1> The insulation position is "INTEGRAL" with the wall's thermal mass. Use insulation position #2.
All cells filled with perlite loose fill
U=0.098
ASHRAE/IES STANDARD 90.1-1989
ENERGY EFFICIENT DESIGN OF NEW BUILDINGS EXCEPT LOW-RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
CITY:70 El Paso TX
CODE:<B,C,H,>:Both Heated and Cooled
BUILDING:Medium Office Building
DATE:12" CMU 90 PCF Perlite

WALL ORIENTATION

N NE E SE S SW W NW WEIGHTED AVERAGE CRITERIA

WL AREA 4113
7137
4299
6023
0.284 0.281
GL AREA 1096
1950
1170
1914
WWR WWR
SCx 0.482
0.482
0.482
0.482
0.482 0.500
PF 0.20
0.18
0.18
0.20
0.189 0.0
VLT 0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.360 N/A
Uof 1.042
1.042
1.042
1.042
1.042 1.230
WALL Uo 0.098
0.098
0.098
0.098
0.098 0.158
HC 9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.300 1
INS POS 2
2
2
2
2 N/A
EQUIP 0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50 0.500
LIGHTS 1.73
1.73
1.73
1.73
1.73 1.730
DLCF 0
0
0
0
0.000 0.0

LOADS TOTAL
HEATING 1.375
1.762
0.778
1.680
5.594< 7.564
COOLING 7.394
16.493
9.243
15.063
48.193< 59.171
TOTAL 8.769
18.255
10.020
16.743
53.788< 66.736


(Computer screen information ENVSTD Version 2.2) ***** PASSES *****

Back to top

EXAMPLE 4 - Office Building El Paso, TX
TYPICAL FACE BRICK STEEL STUD WALL
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION HC R
Face Brick, 4" 8.16 0.40 The insulation position is "INTERIOR" with the wall's thermal mass. Use insulation position #3.
Fiber board sheathing 1/2" reg. density 0.23 1.32
Insulation R-19 metal stud 2X6 @ 16 o.c. 0.44 7.60 (Uncorrected R=19)
Gypsum board, 1/2" 0.54 0.45
Film coefficients, (sum of inside and outside)
0.85

____ ____

9.37 10.62 (Uncorrected R=22)


U=0.094
ASHRAE/IES STANDARD 90.1-1989
ENERGY EFFICIENT DESIGN OF NEW BUILDINGS EXCEPT LOW-RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
CITY:70 El Paso TX
CODE:<B,C,H,>:Both Heated and Cooled
BUILDING:Medium Office Building
DATE:R-19 STUD 16" o.c.

WALL ORIENTATION

N NE E SE S SW W NW WEIGHTED AVERAGE CRITERIA

WL AREA 4113
7137
4299
6023
0.284 0.281
GL AREA 1096
1950
1170
1914
WWR WWR
SCx 0.482
0.482
0.482
0.482
0.482 0.500
PF 0.20
0.18
0.18
0.20
0.189 0.0
VLT 0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.360 N/A
Uof 1.042
1.042
1.042
1.042
1.042 1.230
WALL Uo 0.094
0.094
0.094
0.094
0.094 0.158
HC 9.37
9.37
9.37
9.37
9.370 1
INS POS 3
3
3
3
3 N/A
EQUIP 0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50 0.500
LIGHTS 1.73
1.73
1.73
1.73
1.73 1.730
DLCF 0
0
0
0
0.000 0.0

LOADS TOTAL
HEATING 1.429
1.834
0.903
1.771
5.939< 7.564
COOLING 7.541
16.882
9.531
15.429
48.383< 59.171
TOTAL 8.970
18.716
10.434
17.200
55.322< 66.736


(Computer screen information ENVSTD Version 2.2) ***** PASSES *****

Back to top


Copyright 1998, Norlite Corporation, all rights reserved.